Powder River Coal Co. v. Wyoming Department of Revenue
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[¶1] Powder River Coal Company (PRCC)produces coal and sells it away from the mouth of each of its mines. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 89-14-108(b)(vii) (LexisNexis 2005) requires the coal be valued for severance and ad valorem tax purposes using the proportionate profits method. In applying this method, costs must be categorized as either direct or indirect and PRCC contended employee healthcare costs were indirect costs. The Department of Revenue (DOR) disagreed, determined those costs should be treated as direct mining costs, and assessed PRCC accordingly for production years 1997-2000.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Parker Land & Cattle Co. v. Wyoming Game & Fish CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Rasmussen v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1897
- Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- State Department of Revenue & Taxation v. PacificorpWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- RME Petroleum Co. v. Wyoming Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- State Department of Corrections v. WattsWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Hanover Compression, LPWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company v. Infrassure, LtdWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.