Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 10, 1985No. 5-84-0483PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE JONES

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, Louis Wilson, Jr., brought this action to recover damages for injuries he sustained as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendants, Lester Cordevant and Clark Oil and Refining Corporation (Clark). The plaintiff’s injuries resulted when he was shot accidentally by Cordevant, an employee of Clark, at a gasoline service station operated by Clark in Washington Park. The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss Cordevant as a defendant was granted at the close of the plaintiff’s case, and the jury subsequently returned a verdict…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Klatt v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Sunseri v. PucciaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Darner v. ColbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Trout v. Bank of BellevilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Wesbrock v. Colby, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pyne v. WitmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Mitchell v. Norman James Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Suzanne Figueroa and Luis Figueroa v. Evangelical Covenant Church D/B/A North Park CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Pyne v. WitmerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. DownsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API