Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Walter

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Bill to quiet title. On final hearing on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

This suit is brought under the act “ to compel the determination of claims to real estate in certain cases, and to quiet the title to the same.” Rev. p. 1189. The bill alleges that the complainant, ever since the conveyance of the property in question to him, has been in peaceable possession thereof — claiming to own and owning the same in fee simple. One of the defendants has answered. She denies that the complainant is or ever has been in possession of the property under or by virtue of his conveyance, or in any other way or manner; and she alleges that she and those under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trustees of East Hampton v. . KirkNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Wheeler v. . SpinolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Cook v. . McClureNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hyland v. KirkmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. Harz v. Board of Commerce NavigationNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API