Legal Opinion

General Electric Co., Aerospace Group v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 19, 1990No. 25-89CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

The pending cross-motions for summary judgment raise the question of whether there is a conflict between a Defense Acquisition Regulation provision dealing with foreign selling costs and a Cost Accounting Standard describing allocation of costs. The matter has been fully briefed and orally argued. For the reasons expressed herein, the court concludes that there is no conflict between the two provisions, and that defendant’s motion is due to be granted.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND1

This is an action brought under the Contracts Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1988).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. The United States v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Electric Company, Aerospace Group v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Cross Petroleum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API