Legal Opinion

Read Drug & Chemical Co. v. Nattans

Baltimore City Circuit Court

Decided November 29, 1916Published

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, J.—

Before discussing the case it is proper to dispose of the motions presented by the defendant to strike out certain testimony of Mayor S. Half!! and the exceptions to the testimony of Samuel L. Baehrach. The motions are so general in their form that it is difficult to pass upon them further than to say that so far as any communications tending to show that Ralph A. Nattans and Lee S. Meyer said anything to bind the defendant the motions should be sustained, as there has been no evidence to show that either of these parties were agents of the defendant.

In regard to the exceptions to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carmine v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  2. Caplan v. BucknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  3. Ben Franklin Insurance v. GillettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  4. Swindell Bros. v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API