In Re the Marriage of O'Donnell-Lamont
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDeits, C. J.
I agree with the lead opinion that the 2001 amendments to ORS 109.119 apply to this case. For the reasons articulated by Judge Landau, however, I believe that this case should be remanded to develop the factual record. However, because the case will not be remanded, I write separately to emphasize the concerns about the lead opinion’s statutory analysis that Judge Landau identifies.
The lead opinion reasons, in part, that, because the 2001 amendments apply,
“[t]he presumption in ORS 109.119(2)(a), that a legal parent acts in the best interests of the child, is the legislature’s statement of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In the Matter of Marriage of O'donnell-Lamont and LamontCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002