Legal Opinion

Trifeld v. Winchester Development Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 19, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The statement of the condition of these causes is quite succinctly stated in the complainants' brief as follows:

"The bills filed in all the above cases were ordinary foreclosure bills, in all of which the Winchester Development Company was made a defendant, as the owner of the fee. They fall into three groups, as was pointed out at the time of the trial.
"The first group, consisting of the Trifeld, Hamilton andSeaboard Cases, are cases in which the receiver alone filed an answer and counter-claim. The receiver's answer sets up that the mortgages were executed by two parties purporting to act…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scala Realty Co. v. Bayonne Ice Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beck v. Edwards Lewis, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API