Legal Opinion

Metz v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 29, 2013No. 12-3507PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COWEN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant William Metz (“Metz”) appeals a decision of the Federal Mine Safe*311ty and Health Review Commission (“Commission”). The Commission affirmed a decision by an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) who, after conducting a hearing, concluded that Metz’s discharge by Appellee Carmeuse Lime, Inc. (“Carmeuse”) was not a violation of section 105(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 815(c). We will affirm.

I

We write exclusively for the parties who are familiar with the factual context and legal history of this case. Therefore, we set forth only…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Cumberland Coal Resources, LP v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. Consolidation Coal Company v. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hyer v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2014
  2. COLEMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  3. DANCE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  4. Faith S. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  5. JOHNSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API