Metz v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COWEN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant William Metz (“Metz”) appeals a decision of the Federal Mine Safe*311ty and Health Review Commission (“Commission”). The Commission affirmed a decision by an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) who, after conducting a hearing, concluded that Metz’s discharge by Appellee Carmeuse Lime, Inc. (“Carmeuse”) was not a violation of section 105(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 815(c). We will affirm.
I
We write exclusively for the parties who are familiar with the factual context and legal history of this case. Therefore, we set forth only…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cumberland Coal Resources, LP v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Consolidation Coal Company v. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hyer v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2014
- COLEMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- DANCE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- Faith S. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- JOHNSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.