Richardson v. Brooks

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming*.

The question in this case is purely one of fact. Under a contract which is set out in the ease of Brooks *831v. Richardson, 144 Ky., 102, Richardson was required to support Brooks and his wife during the terms of their natural lives. The case was submitted to a special commissioner of the Hart Circuit Court for the purpose of taking eivdence on this subject and reporting his conclusions to the court. The order directed the commissioner to report what amount of money annually would be necessary to provide Perry C. Brooks for his personal use, with…