Legal Opinion

Fordyce v. Humphrey

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 7, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Taylor District Court. — Hon. H. K. Evans, Judge. . Action on a promissory note, resulting in a judgment for defendant. Tbe plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

i. Appeal: certification and transcript: for I. Appellee moves that the evidence be stricken from the abstract for that neither the transcript nor the notes 'of the shorthand reporter were • n i -, m i • • rm certified and filed m time, lhe point is not x well taken, for both were duly certified and filed within six months after the entry of judgment. Section 3652, Code; Dietz v. Capital City Brick & Pike Co., 103 Iowa, 542.

2‘ certification sufficiency!5* * Nor can it be said that the certification of the transcript was insufficient. Therein the judge and reporter certified “that the within…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGillivary Bros. v. CaseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Dietz v. Capital City Brick & Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. King v. HartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Ottumwa v. McCarthy Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. Rosencrans v. WoodbridgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API