Legal Opinion

Ahlemeyer v. Miller

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 14, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Minturn, J.

The suit is in ejectment, and the motion is to strike out the complaint. Mary Elizabeth Miller and John Miller, her husband, conveyed the premises known as 389-391 Grove street, in Jersey City, by deed dated September 19th, 1891, and thereafter duly recorded, to George Miller, their son, and Beata K. Miller, his wife: After the statement of the usual habendum, the deed contained the following limitation, viz.: “To the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said party of the second part, and the survivor of them during the lifetime of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of LeaskNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Hockaday v. LynnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Puterbaugh's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Butler v. HuestisIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Yates's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. HallNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  2. In Re FislerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
  3. In re the Trust for the Benefit of DukeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  4. Commercial Trust Co. of N.J. v. AdelungNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  5. In Re Estate of CoryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API