Legal Opinion

Bradford v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1922No. 6 Div. 855PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County ; H. P. Heflin, Judge. E. C. Bradford was convicted for failing or refusing to dip tick-infested cattle, and he appeals. The court erred in overruling demurrers to the affidavit and in refusing the charges requested. 17 Ala. App. 419, 84 South. 883.

1Opinion of the CourtMerritt, J.

On appeal from the Jefferson county court of misdemeanor, to the circuit court, the defendant was convicted under a complaint which charged that he failed to dip his cattle after being warned to do so.

[1] There are certain demurrers set out in the record, but the judgment entry does not recite that they were presented to, considered, or acted upon by the court, and, this being true, this court cannot consider them. Birmingham, E. & B. R. R. Co. v. Hoskins, 14 Ala. App. 254, 69 South. 339; Yarbrough v. State, 15 Ala. App. 460, 73 South. 830.

However, the questions raised by the demurrers have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Birmingham E. & B. R. R. v. HoskinsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Moran v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Graham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Yarbrough v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Ward v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Samples v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Long v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API