Legal Opinion
Cancino v. Craven
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 22, 1973No. Civ. No. 69-881-AAHPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*819FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HAUK, District Judge.
The above entitled matter having come on for evidentiary hearing on May 7, 1973, ordered by the Ninth Circuit, 467 F.2d 1243, the Court makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Petitioner in the above entitled case was aware of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences of his plea of guilty when he pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of possession of heroin.
2. Petitioner’s counsel discussed the consequences of petitioner’s plea and admission of the prior felony conviction with him and the differences in sentences between…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Emanuel W. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Harry C. Knowles v. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Valenti v. LumbardSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jess Cancino v. Walter E. CravenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Albert Wright v. Walter E. Craven, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sober v. CristDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1982