Legal Opinion
Camacho v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 7, 2006No. 05-35324Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Camacho appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Icicle Sea-foods, Inc., in his suit for recovery under the Jones Act, 46 App. U.S.C. § 688(a), and the admiralty common law doctrines of unseaworthiness and maintenance and cure. Because Camacho failed to produce evidence from which a reasonable fact finder could find in his favor at trial on the Jones Act and unseaworthiness claims, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of these two claims. We conclude, however, that the record contains evidence of a material issue of fact whether Camacho is entitled to damages…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- John Witherow v. Marvin PaffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Bagdadi v. NazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.