Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, Pet v. Maurer, E.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 2014No. 293 MAL 2014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*14 ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 30th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, pursuant to Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki, 513 Pa. 508, 522 A.2d 17, 19 (1987); Commonwealth v. Provenzano, 50 A.3d 148, 154 (Pa.Super.2012) (“[W]e cannot look beyond the statement of questions presented and the prefatory 2119(f) statement to determine whether a substantial question exists.”); and Commonwealth v. Felix, 372 Pa.Super. 145, 539 A.2d 371, 377 (1988) (“[G]leaning through the entire argument section of appellant’s brief for indications of…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. ProvenzanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. FelixSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jacob, K. v. UCBR of: UCBRSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Jacobs v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API