Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Steel & Iron Corp. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided April 13, 1964No. Docket No. 91893UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1. Petitioner purchased, under a written Agreement of Sale, dated January 23, 1956, certain assets, including all machinery and equipment, and business of the Philadelphia Steel and Iron Company, effective as of January 1, 1956. Petitioner paid $472,232.46 for the assets in controversy. Under the Agreement of Sale $1.00 was designated for good will and the balance to depreciable property.

Read the full summary

1. Petitioner purchased, under a written Agreement of Sale, dated January 23, 1956, certain assets, including all machinery and equipment, and business of the Philadelphia Steel and Iron Company, effective as of January 1, 1956. Petitioner paid $472,232.46 for the assets in controversy. Under the Agreement of Sale $1.00 was designated for good will and the balance to depreciable property. Held: Of the total amount of $472,232.46 paid by petitioner for the purchase of the assets, both tangible and intangible, of the Philadelphia Steel and Iron Company, the sum of $294,967.76 represented the…

1Opinion of the Court

Philadelphia Steel & Iron Corporation v. Commissioner.

Philadelphia Steel & Iron Corp. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 91893.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1964-93; 1964 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 241; 23 T.C.M. (CCH) 558; T.C.M. (RIA) 64093;

April 13, 1964

1. Petitioner purchased, under a written Agreement of Sale, dated January 23, 1956, certain assets, including all machinery and equipment, and business of the Philadelphia Steel and Iron Company, effective as of January 1, 1956. Petitioner paid $472,232.46 for the assets in controversy. Under the Agreement of Sale $1.00 was designated for good will and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Gooding Amusement Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  3. Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Hamlin's Trust v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Nowel's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  5. In Re the Accounting of BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jack Daniel Distillery, Lem Motlow, Prop., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. R. M. Smith, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. Miami Valley Broadcasting Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  4. Deseret Management Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API