Legal Opinion

Swallow v. Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1925No. Docket No. 4006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This is an action to recover an attorney’s fee. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant Soteras and against defendant Francisco. The latter appeals.

The sole point presented by appellant is that the findings of the trial court are not responsive to the issues framed by the pleadings. The complaint alleged that at all times mentioned in it respondent was a duly licensed, qualified and practicing attorney at law in the state; that within two years last past, he, at the special instance and request of defendants performed certain legal services for which they promised and agreed to pay him…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Gaffny v. MichaelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Coley v. WolcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API