Legal Opinion
United States v. Toronto, Hamilton & Buffalo Navigation Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 12, 1949No. 39PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
338 U.S. 396 (1949)
UNITED STATES
v.
TORONTO, HAMILTON & BUFFALO NAVIGATION CO.
No. 39.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 9, 1949.
Decided December 12, 1949.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS.
Paul A. Sweeney argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman and Assistant Attorney General Morison.
Gerald E. Dwyer argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Frederick L. Wheeler and C. Austin White.
2Opinion of the Court · ClarkJustice Clark
We are faced again with elusive questions of property valuation in determining whether the United States awarded "just compensation"…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Property Reserve, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Joaquin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016