Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Holder

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1920No. Crim. No. 731PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This is an application for a writ of 7tabeas corpus. The petition alleges, among other things, “that W. H. Holder is imprisoned, detained, confined and restrained of his liberty” by the sheriff of Los Angeles County “by virtue of an indictment charging him with embezzlement under section 506 of the Penal Code of' the State of California, as amended in 1919, a copy of which indictment is herewith attached and made a part hereof.” (Italics ours.)

The indictment is in two counts, identical in form, but relating to separate offenses of the same class. For our present purposes we quote the preamble…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of RuefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. In Re KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. In Re AvdalasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. McCaughey v. SchuetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. HolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API