Legal Opinion
Pullman Co. v. Ray
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 9, 1953No. [No. 51, October Term, 1952.]PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.
This appeal is from a judgment on a jury’s verdict for damages for breach of an alleged oral contract of life employment. The questions raised are as to the correctness of the rulings on demurrer and motion for judgment, the correctness of the rulings on the demurrer prayers and motion for judgment n.o.v., and the correctness of the court’s charge to the jury.
The original declaration alleged that the plaintiff was employed as a Pullman porter on June 1, 1924, when he had an accident in the course of his employment and suffered serious injuries including the loss of a leg; that while…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Savarese v. Pyrene Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Heaman v. E. N. Rowell Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Crunkilton v. HookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- General Paint Corporation v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Spacesaver Systems, Inc. v. AdamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Yost v. EarlyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Tellez v. Canton Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Lipscomb v. HessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.