Legal Opinion

Kenney v. Amodei

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 4, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and new trial granted. Memorandum: The trial court erred in receiving, over defendant’s objection, testimony from one of plaintiff’s treating physicians, based on his examination conducted the day before trial commenced, that plaintiff suffered a permanent neck injury. This testimony should have been precluded because plaintiff did not mention this specific injury in her bill of particulars (CPLR 3042 [c]), and did not timely disclose the doctor’s findings as required by this department’s rules (22 NYCRR 1024.25 [c], [e]; Cramer v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Mooney v. OvittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Cramer v. Toledo Scale Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martinkus v. DahmenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Kenney v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Martinkus v. DahmenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API