United States v. Castro
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are various pre-trial motions by Defendant Ledwin Castro (“Castro”). Castro contends that: (1) the indictment must be dismissed under the rule announced in Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U.S. 121, 79 S.Ct. 676, 3 L.Ed.2d 684 (1959) because it violates the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy; (2) the Government should be precluded from calling FBI Special Agent Reynaldo Tariche as an expert witness; and (3) the Court should preclude various pieces of evidence that the Government intends to offer at the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Heath v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. MejiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Castro v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. CastroDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- United States v. PirkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017