Legal Opinion

United States v. Castro

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 3, 2009No. 2:03-cv-00851PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are various pre-trial motions by Defendant Ledwin Castro (“Castro”). Castro contends that: (1) the indictment must be dismissed under the rule announced in Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U.S. 121, 79 S.Ct. 676, 3 L.Ed.2d 684 (1959) because it violates the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy; (2) the Government should be precluded from calling FBI Special Agent Reynaldo Tariche as an expert witness; and (3) the Court should preclude various pieces of evidence that the Government intends to offer at the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Heath v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. United States v. MejiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Castro v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  2. United States v. CastroDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  3. United States v. PirkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API