Legal Opinion

Keller v. Noble

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1988No. 86-918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Neal L. and Pauline M. Keller, allege they suffered $191,640 in damages as the result of the breach by defendant-appellee and cross-appellant, Gayle K. Noble, of his written agreement to purchase certain real estate from them. Noble in turn counterclaimed for the refund of his $15,000 downpayment. The district court accepted the jury’s verdict, finding against the Kellers on their petition and against Noble on his counterclaim, thereby in effect awarding the Kellers $15,000 in damages. In their appeal to this court, the Kellers assign as error certain of the district…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Omaha Min. v. First Nat. Bank of BellevueNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Fischer v. Curtis State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Havlicek v. DesaiNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. McCready v. Al Eighmy DodgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCune v. NeitzelNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Palmtag v. Gartner Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Blue Valley Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. GFH Financial Services Corp. v. KirkNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Lowther v. RigglemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API