Legal Opinion

Woody v. STERLING ALUMINUM PRODUCTS INCORPORATED

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided January 21, 1965No. 63 C 345PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

244 F.Supp. 84 (1965)

John WOODY et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

STERLING ALUMINUM PRODUCTS INCORPORATED, a Missouri Corporation, et al., Defendants.

No. 63 C 345.

United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D.

January 21, 1965.

Jerome J. Duff, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Bartlett, Muldoon, Stix & Bartlett, Bartley & Siegel, Anderson, Gilbert, Wolfort, Allen, St. Louis, Mo., for defendants.

REGAN, District Judge.

The one hundred and ninety-three plaintiffs have brought their action in four counts. The named defendants are the plaintiffs' former employer, Sterling Aluminum Products Co., hereafter…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 89 v. Riss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Frank Sabolsky v. Michael Budzanoski Appeal of Louis A. AntalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  2. Safe Workers' Organization, Chapter No. 2 v. BallingerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1974
  3. Woody v. Sterling Aluminum Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  4. Aho v. BintzDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
  5. Woody v. Sterling Aluminum Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API