Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 10, 2008No. 200210573; A132275PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant has moved for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Jones, 223 Or App 70, 195 P3d 78 (2008), on the ground that the opinion contains a factual error. ORAP 6.25(1). We grant reconsideration, modify our original opinion as set out below, and adhere to that opinion as modified.

Defendant was charged with felony driving while suspended. In our original opinion, we concluded that defendant was not entitled to challenge collaterally the November 14, 2001, suspension order of the Department of Transportation, Driver and Motor Vehicle Services Division (DMV), that formed a basis for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RustCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. YocomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. State v. SchrinerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. State v. SchrinerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. State v. RustCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API