Legal Opinion

Djomlija v. Urban

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 1982No. 79-1516, 79-2103, 80-490 consPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rizzi

Plaintiffs, Mile and Mira Djomlija, brought suit for specific performance of a real estate contract against defendants, Kenneth and Margaret Urban. The trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs. We affirm.

On June 28, 1977, the parties entered into a contract whereby defendants were to convey to plaintiffs a six-unit apartment building in Des Plaines, Illinois, at a price of $134,900. The contract contained a mortgage contingency clause which provided that plaintiffs had 30 days within which to secure a written mortgage commitment. Plaintiffs were to notify defendants in writing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Needy v. SparksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Ullsperger v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Hernandez v. Power Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Meyer v. MurrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Illinois Valley Asphalt, Inc. v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dawn M. Newsom, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lawrence FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Chariot Holdings, Ltd. v. Eastmet Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Djikas v. GrafftAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Charles v. GoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Omni Partners v. DownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API