Legal Opinion
Miron Lumber Co. v. Phylco Realty Development Co.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided March 12, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*140OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard Rivera, J.
QUESTION PRESENTED
In this action to recover payment for goods sold and delivered, the corporate defendant moves by order to show cause to vacate the default judgment entered against it on January 11, 1991. In support of the motion, defendant asserts that it did not personally receive the summons in time to defend this action, and that it has meritorious defenses against defendant’s claims. Plaintiff opposes the motion maintaining that it properly served the defendant with process pursuant to CPLR 312-a and that such service conferred jurisdiction over the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A. C. Dutton Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Feinstein v. BergnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- McDonald v. Ames Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Macchia v. RussoNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Markoff v. South Nassau Community HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- John Buggs v. Celine Ehrnschwender, Alice Wright and Tiffany WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Kostelanetz & Fink, L. L. P. v. Hui Qun ZhaoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999