Martinez v. Mintz Law Firm, LLC
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Coats
dlssentmg
142 I take the time to wmte in dlssent because I not only believe the majority is wrong but also that its. ruhng today substantially alters the nature and impairs the protections of the "attorney's lien," an eneum-brance on the property of clients that has been available to attorneys for the collection of legal fees in this jurisdiction since before statehood. I also feel compelled to note the irony of having this momentous step taken precipitously, by a bare majority of a five-voting-member court, in a case in which the majority's interpretation of the attorney's lien statute was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fillmore v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Collins v. ThuringerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
- People Ex Rel. MacFarlane v. HarthunSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Gee v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Matter of Estate of BenneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.