Legal Opinion · Dissent

Martinez v. Mintz Law Firm, LLC

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 31, 2016No. Supreme Court Case No. 14SC1Published

1DissentJustice Coats

dlssentmg

142 I take the time to wmte in dlssent because I not only believe the majority is wrong but also that its. ruhng today substantially alters the nature and impairs the protections of the "attorney's lien," an eneum-brance on the property of clients that has been available to attorneys for the collection of legal fees in this jurisdiction since before statehood. I also feel compelled to note the irony of having this momentous step taken precipitously, by a bare majority of a five-voting-member court, in a case in which the majority's interpretation of the attorney's lien statute was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fillmore v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Collins v. ThuringerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  3. People Ex Rel. MacFarlane v. HarthunSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. Gee v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. Matter of Estate of BenneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API