Legal Opinion
Pappas v. Moss
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 15, 1966No. Civ. A. 96-62PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge:
This action was initially instituted by certain minority stockholders against a New Jersey corporation (Hydromatics), and three of its five officers and directors. Defendants Edward Nathan, and Philip Brooks as Trustee of the Employees’ Profit Sharing and Retirement Trust, were joined in the amended and supplemental complaint. When the action was commenced jurisdiction was predicated upon diversity of citizenship; but subsequent proceedings therein destroyed the diversity but invoked jurisdiction under a federal statute. Jurisdiction of the original single count of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Perry O. Hooper, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Consolidated American Industries, Inc. v. Mountain States Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- deHaas v. Empire Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,642 Kenneth Rekant on Behalf of Himself as an Individual, Etc. v. Arthur A. DesserCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.