Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Gerbert

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 12, 1996No. A95A1021, A95A1341 and A95A1342Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBeasley, Chief Judge

I respectfully dissent with respect to the affirmance of Gerbert’s conviction and specially concur with respect to affirmance of the discharges and acquittals granted to Damron and Kiser. I concur fully in Divisions 2 through 6 of the majority opinion but not in Division 1.

Judicially compelled cessation of prosecution of a criminal offense is an “extreme sanction” for the State’s tardiness in proceeding. Ferris v. State, 172 Ga. App. 729, 731 (1) (324 SE2d 762) (1984). It is what the law requires when the defendant has properly filed a demand for speedy trial. OCGA § 17-7-170 (b). It is not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Ferris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Weaver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Duncan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. State v. LipskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API