Legal Opinion

Ned Tyson v. State of Iowa, John Schroeder v. Ned Tyson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 16, 1960No. 16460, 16464PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.

United States of America brought this condemnation action, pursuant to constitutional and statutory authority, to acquire 242.83 acres of specifically described land located in Harrison County, Iowa, for the purpose of stabilizing the channel of the Missouri River. A declaration of taking was filed and $12,680, the estimated just compensation, was deposited in the registry of the court. The government has taken possession of the land.

Numerous claimants of title to the land were made defendants. No one has contested the government’s right to condemn the land.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mrs. Mary Ellen Pritchard, Wife of Charles C. Pritchard v. Eugene G. Smith, Chief of Police, City of Little Rock, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  2. United States v. 88.28 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Porter County, State of Indiana, Appeal of Mary W. CrumpackerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  3. Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1981
  5. Garrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API