Dean v. Dean
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
607 So.2d 494 (1992)
Ruth DEAN, and Barry Krischer, Petitioners,
v.
Roger DEAN, Respondent.
No. 92-0669.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
November 4, 1992.
Rehearing Denied December 2, 1992.
Joel M. Weissman of Joel M. Weissman, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Barry E. Krischer of Salnick & Krischer, West Palm Beach, for petitioners.
Joseph D. Farish of Farish, Farish, and Romani, of West Palm Beach, for respondent.
FARMER, Judge.
The issue raised here is whether the attorney-client privilege can be used to prevent the disclosure of the identity of a person who had previously consulted…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. HayesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Sowers v. OlwellWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Keir v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- American Tobacco Co. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Dane P. Abdool v. Pam Bondi, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2014
- Gerheiser v. StephensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- The Florida Bar v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.