Legal Opinion

Horowitz v. Threadneedle Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 7, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover proceeds under a livestock mortality insurance policy, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ramirez, J.), dated April 10, 1991, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, struck the defendants’ answer, and denied their cross motion for summary judgment.

*590Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs seek to recover the proceeds under a livestock mortality insurance policy for the death of their horse. The horse had been delivered by the plaintiffs to a trainer who, in turn, had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Slocovich v. Orient Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Neuwirth v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. AFA Protective System Inc. v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Vinocur's Inc. v. CNA InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bedford Central School District v. Commercial Union InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Scalia v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Brunswick Hospital Center, Inc. v. KnoblichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API