Legal Opinion

Maignan v. Nahar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 13, 2007PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silverman, J.), dated April 17, 2006, which conditionally granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike the defendant’s answer unless he appeared for a deposition within a specified time.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To invoke the drastic remedy of striking an answer, it must be shown that a defendant’s failure to comply with a disclosure order was the result of willful and contumacious conduct (see CPLR…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kihl v. PfefferNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Bates v. BaezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Patterson v. Greater New York Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Robinson v. Rollins Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Kennedy v. ClassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Carabello v. LunaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Almonte v. PichardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Yong Soon Oh v. Hua JinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Kirkland v. FayneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Guardado v. K.B.G. Commercial, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API