Rochell v. City of Florence
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The appeal challenges the decree denying permanent injunction, and in dismiss • ing appellant’s bill.
The ordinance of the City of Florence taxing a firm or corporation engaging in the business of distributing manufactured soft drinks in the City of Florence exclusively from a warehouse located anywhere else is unreasonable and unconstitutional, and of no effect.
The pertinent part of the city ordinance ■ in question is Section 23, which reads as. follows:
“Section 23. Bottling Works — Manufacturers or bottlers of soft drinks, extracts, or beverages ........... $200.00
“Any…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Board of Commissioners v. Orr.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- City Council v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Hardie-Tynes Mfg. Co. v. CruiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- In re DorseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Al Means, Inc. v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- City of Birmingham v. Birmingham Business College, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- City of Birmingham v. Home Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Pruett v. BrittainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970