Legal Opinion

Rochell v. City of Florence

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 30, 1939No. 8 Div. 955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The appeal challenges the decree denying permanent injunction, and in dismiss • ing appellant’s bill.

The ordinance of the City of Florence taxing a firm or corporation engaging in the business of distributing manufactured soft drinks in the City of Florence exclusively from a warehouse located anywhere else is unreasonable and unconstitutional, and of no effect.

The pertinent part of the city ordinance ■ in question is Section 23, which reads as. follows:

“Section 23. Bottling Works — Manufacturers or bottlers of soft drinks, extracts, or beverages ........... $200.00
“Any…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Board of Commissioners v. Orr.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. City Council v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. Hardie-Tynes Mfg. Co. v. CruiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. In re DorseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1838

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Al Means, Inc. v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. City of Birmingham v. Birmingham Business College, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. City of Birmingham v. Home Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Pruett v. BrittainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API