Heller v. Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Welfare Plan
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
At issue in this case is the plaintiff Edward Heller’s (“Heller”) 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) claim that the defendants CapGemini U.S. LLC (“CapGemini”) and American International Life Assurance Company of New York (“American”) wrongfully denied him accidental death benefits under the ERISA-governed insurance policy of his now deceased wife, a former employee of CapGemini. American denied Heller benefits because his wife was no longer employed by CapGemini at the time of her death and therefore not covered under the unambiguous terms of the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Luis E. Rodriguez-Abreu v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- The Boston Five Cents Savings Bank v. Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Ervin B. Madden v. Itt Long Term Disability Plan for Salaried Employees Federal Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carder-Cowin v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2008
- Situation Management Systems v. ASP Consulting GroupDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Ministeri v. AECOM Technology CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- SHIELDS v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
- SHIELDS v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.