Legal Opinion
Lexington Acupuncture, P.C. v. State Farm Insurance
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 7, 2006PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order reversed without costs, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment denied and defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, compel responses to its discovery demands granted to the extent of directing that plaintiff shall respond to those discovery demands which seek information regarding whether plaintiff was fraudulently incorporated, within 30 days of the date of the order entered hereon, or within such other reasonable period as the parties stipulate to in writing.
In this action to recover $1,400 in first-party no-fault benefits…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Presbyterian Hospital v. Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MallelaNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Mary Immaculate Hospital v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Nyack Hospital v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lexington Acupuncture, P.C. v. General Assurance Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2012
- Carothers v. Insurance CompaniesCivil Court of the City of New York · 2006
- Complete Orthopedic Supplies, Inc. v. State Farm InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2007
- Crossbay Acupuncture, P.C. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
- Downtown Acupuncture PC v. State Wide Ins.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.