Legal Opinion

Caruthers v. Lake County Mfg. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

A construction of the Compensation Act of 1919, chapter 123, as amended by chapter 84 of the Acts of 1923, is involved. The deceased employee left only a dependent widow. His wages had been $15 per week. Thirty per cent, thereof (paragraph 5 of section 30) being less than the minimum (paragraph 16, Id.), the trial judge decreed to the widow $5 a week for four hundred weeks. She appeals and insists that by virtue of paragraph 3 of section 1 of the amendatory act of 1923, she is entitled of fifty per centum of the deceased’s wages.

The purpose of the pertinent part of the amendatory act is thus…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stonega Coke & Coal Co. v. Southern Steel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hays v. Federal Chemical Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Mangrum v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  4. College Coal Mining Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Haynes v. Columbia Pictures Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API