Legal Opinion

Kaye v. Coughlin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 13, 1969No. 4301PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER, Associate Justice.

Seymour Kaye has appealed from a judgment denying him a recovery of a commission on the sale of real estate. Kaye had “an exclusive right to sell” as distinguished from an “exclusive agent to sell” contract for the sale of a house and lot in Dallas with the owner Gilbert H. Coughlin. Baker v. Skipworth, 244 S.W.2d 299 (Tex.Civ.App.1951, writ ref.). The listing contract was dated July 19th, 1966. It gave Kaye the exclusive right to sell the property for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the contract. It contained the further provision that:

“If the said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker v. SkipworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Briggs v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wade v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Julius Tofias & Co. v. John B. Stetson Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Mellos v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. White v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Leadership Real Estate v. HarperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API