Ex Parte Conradi

On Rehearing.

THOMAS, J.

Appellant mistakes the averments of the petition contained in the opinion for a statement by the court of the effect of the “prayer for process” to the alleged cross-bill by Herman G. Schoenherr. However, the quotations as indicated in the original opinion (which has been corrected) no doubt led to that result. It is declared that a cross-bill is required to be as perfect as an original bill. Hooper v. Armstrong, 69 Ala. 343; Cooper v. Cooper (Ala. Sup.) 97 South. 66; 1 Haralson v. Whitcomb, 200 Ala. 165, 75 South. 913; Farmers’ State Bank v. Kirkland & Brackin, 200…