Legal Opinion

Isaac v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 3, 1961No. 2515PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

The appellant (defendant) was charged with the crime of breaking and entering a store house with intent to commit a felony, to-wit: Grand Larceny. After trial, the jury returned a verdict of guilty of breaking and entering a store house with intent to commit a misdemeanor, to-wit: Petty Larceny. The court entered judgment and sentenced him to serve a term of five years in the state prison. The defendant appealed, contending that there was no evidence to establish any breaking on the part of the defendant. For the reasons hereinafter noted, it is unnecessary for us to decide this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jalbert v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Interlandi v. PettewaySupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Skov v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Footman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API