Legal Opinion

Ross v. Barnett

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 20, 2018No. 20160652-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAGEN, Judge:

¶ 1 Appellant Michael Barnett asks this court to review fourteen issues arising from supplemental proceedings in which attorney Douglas R. Short represented Barnett as an intervenor. In the underlying case, plaintiffs Yan Ross and Randi Wagner obtained a judgment against defendant Global Fraud Solutions (GFS). When Ross and Wagner sought a writ of execution against GFS's assets, GFS claimed that some of the assets were owned by its general manager, Barnett, and thus were not subject to execution to satisfy the judgment against GFS. Barnett filed a motion to intervene and a motion…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. J.M.W. v. T.I.Z.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cheves v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Reisbeck v. HCA Health Services of Utah, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. A.S. v. R.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Smith v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hutchings v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  2. Ross v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  3. UDAK Properties v. Spanish ForkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. Telos Ventures Group PLLC v. ShortUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2021
  5. Telos Ventures Group PLLC v. ShortUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API