Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of James

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 19, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

When this proceeding was last before the court, four questions were presented for a determination. The first, relating to a sale of the decedent’s interest in the good will of the partnership business in which he was associated at the time of his death, was then decided; the second, respecting the indebtedness of John F. James to the estate, was referred to William Murray, Esq., as referee, and the remaining two were reserved. The referee has held protracted hearings on the questions referred to him and has filed his report wherein he finds that at the time of the death of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ridden v. . ThrallNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. In Re the Accounting of Van AlstyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Fairchild v. . FairchildNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. In Re the Estate of HousmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Beugger v. AshleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of JamesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of RichNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  3. In re the Estate of WhiteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of SchumacherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API