Legal Opinion

Rosario v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered on or about August 26, 2003, which granted *148defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant, by adducing evidence that it had no notice of the alleged hazard, i.e., a bottle covered with newspaper discarded on subway station stairs, carried its burden as summary judgment movant to demonstrate a prima facie entitlement to judgment, and plaintiff failed to meet its consequent burden to come forward with evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (cf.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Giuffrida v. Metro North Commuter RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Hernandez v. Yonkers Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stagg v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Williams v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Tower Insurance v. BCS Construction Services Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Tower Insurance v. BCS Construction Services Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API