Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1933No. 8 Div. 689PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The prosecution in the court below was predicated upon an affidavit which charged the defendant with the offense denounced under section 5539, Code 1923, commonly known as violating the Sunday Daw; in this instance he was charged with “gaming” on Sunday. The defendant'interposed a plea of not guilty. His trial was by jury and resulted in his conviction, whereupon judgment of conviction was pronounced and entered, and the court sentenced him to hard* labor for the county. The appeal here is from said judgment., The offense complained of and for which appellant was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stover v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Moses v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Quinn v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Sanford v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Scott v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mickle v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Mickey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API