Nash v. State

(dissenting).—It is urgently insisted by the Assistant Attorney-General, joined by Mr. Lattimore, the district attorney of the judicial district from which this appeal comes, in a motion for rehearing filed by the State, that this court is in error in reversing the judgment of the lower court. After a careful review of the record I can not agree with the views urged in the motion. To affirm the judgment would be to hold that no corroboration is necessary in a seduction case, thereby usurping the power of the law-making department of the State and overthrowing and destroying a plainly written…