State v. Erwin
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM MAURY. Appeal from the Criminal Court of Maury County. —J. T. McKnight, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fentress
The defendant was indicted for keeping a female dog more than three months of age, without having reported the dog for registration, as required by chapter 32 of the Acts 1907 (Thomp. Shan. Code, section 2853a2 et seq.) He moved to quash the indictment upon the ground that the act was unconstitutional, and the trial judge sustained the motion. The State has appealed to this court.
*343The caption of the act is entitled:
“An act to regulate the keeping of female dogs, by requiring them to be registered and to declare the running at large of unregistered female dogs a public nuisance. ’ ’
It provides…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- McGlone v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Citizens' Rapid Transit Co. v. DewTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- State ex rel. Estes v. PersicaTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Darnell v. ShapardTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- Ponder v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- Franer v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
- State v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1921