Thompson v. Royal Indemnity Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.
The undertaking or bond upon which the defendant here was held liable in this action recited that it was for the release of the attachment in Such other action ; that certain property of the defendants therein had been *44taken by the writ of attachment and was held by the sheriff; th,at such defendants desired a release of such property; and that to obtain such release the defendant here thereby undertook and became bound to the plaintiff, here and there, “that it will, on demand, pay to the plaintiff the amount of the judgment with all costs that may be recovered against defendants in this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dierolf v. WinterfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- Billingsley v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
- Ford v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Thoen v. HarnstromWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Wilkinson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by2 opinions
- Neugent Garment Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Neugent Garment Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930