Legal Opinion

Washington v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 14, 1997No. 96-04197PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Freddrick Washington challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to correct sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) in which the court found his assertion that this mandatory three-year minimum for possession of a firearm 1 was only reviewable if raised by means of a rule 3.850 motion. We reverse.

Attempts to correct sentences which claim, as does Washington’s, an absence of a factual basis to sustain the mandatory portion of the sentence are in fact cognizable through the use of rule 3.800(a). Hubbard v. State, 667 So.2d 936 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). When the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. TrippSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  2. Blackwood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Hubbard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farran v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Lynch v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
  3. Mancino v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API