Legal Opinion

Smith v. Harleysville Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 8, 1981No. 80-3-820PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Here, as in D’Ambrosio v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, 494 Pa. 501, 431 A.2d 966 (1981), an insured seeks to recover punitive damages for an insurer’s alleged “bad faith” conduct in refusing to fulfill its *517obligations under the parties’ contract of insurance. The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia sustained the insurer’s preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer and dismissed those counts of the insured’s complaint seeking punitive damages. The insured failed to seek leave to amend, and a panel of the Superior Court unanimously…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

4Cited by33 opinions

  1. Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Ash v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Harry C. Murray v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. Milcarek v. Nationwide Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  5. Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API